'n Vergelykende studie van die kognitiewe vermoëns van eerstejaarstudente met linker- teenoor regterhemisferiese taalverteenwoordiging
- Authors: Stuart, Anita
- Date: 2015-10-14
- Subjects: Cerebral dominance , Cognition , Brain - Localization of functions , Left and right (Psychology) , Laterality
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:14340 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/14799
- Description: M.A. (Psychology) , The motivation for this research arose from the fact that very little if any empirical research has been done in connection with the cognitive abilities of persons with right hemispheric language representation. Knowledge of the structural and functional correlates of hemispheric asymmetry has thus far been obtained primarily from people with left hemispheric language representation. A further motivation was that the existing knowledge about hemispheric asymmetry has been obtained mainly from studies of patients with brain damage...
- Full Text:
- Authors: Stuart, Anita
- Date: 2015-10-14
- Subjects: Cerebral dominance , Cognition , Brain - Localization of functions , Left and right (Psychology) , Laterality
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:14340 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/14799
- Description: M.A. (Psychology) , The motivation for this research arose from the fact that very little if any empirical research has been done in connection with the cognitive abilities of persons with right hemispheric language representation. Knowledge of the structural and functional correlates of hemispheric asymmetry has thus far been obtained primarily from people with left hemispheric language representation. A further motivation was that the existing knowledge about hemispheric asymmetry has been obtained mainly from studies of patients with brain damage...
- Full Text:
A comparative study of left and right lateralised adolescents with regard to spatial ability
- Authors: Smith, Stanley Andrew
- Date: 2014-04-01
- Subjects: Teenagers - South Africa - Transvaal - Psychology , Laterality , Left- and right-handedness - South Africa - Transvaal
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:4555 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/9904
- Description: M.A. (Psychology) , Spatial ability as a cognitive ability has for some time been recognised as a distinct component in the intellectual make-up of the individual. Since the earliest identification of spatial ability in the 1920's, interest has been shown in the fuller understanding of this ability. Many controversies still exist since spatial ability has yet to be defined in a definitive manner. Spatial ability has received relatively little attention. Since a relationship between spatial ability and occupational success has been established, more interest has been shown in this field. Spatial ability is as important as language for survival in the business world and more so in the technical field. Spatial ability is synonymous with the socalled "minor" hemisphere. The importance of the "minor" hemisphere and in particular the link between the right hemisphere and the language centres of the left hemisphere, has recently been. recognised. This recognition is found where the right hemisphere together with the damaged left hemisphere may be included in a rehabilitation programme. Spatial ability is the product of environmental influences which include child rearing practices, education and nutrition. Other influences are of a genetic, hormonal and neurological nature. Associated the concept terms, the associated with of left with the cognitive functions of the brain, is lateralisation of functions.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Smith, Stanley Andrew
- Date: 2014-04-01
- Subjects: Teenagers - South Africa - Transvaal - Psychology , Laterality , Left- and right-handedness - South Africa - Transvaal
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:4555 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/9904
- Description: M.A. (Psychology) , Spatial ability as a cognitive ability has for some time been recognised as a distinct component in the intellectual make-up of the individual. Since the earliest identification of spatial ability in the 1920's, interest has been shown in the fuller understanding of this ability. Many controversies still exist since spatial ability has yet to be defined in a definitive manner. Spatial ability has received relatively little attention. Since a relationship between spatial ability and occupational success has been established, more interest has been shown in this field. Spatial ability is as important as language for survival in the business world and more so in the technical field. Spatial ability is synonymous with the socalled "minor" hemisphere. The importance of the "minor" hemisphere and in particular the link between the right hemisphere and the language centres of the left hemisphere, has recently been. recognised. This recognition is found where the right hemisphere together with the damaged left hemisphere may be included in a rehabilitation programme. Spatial ability is the product of environmental influences which include child rearing practices, education and nutrition. Other influences are of a genetic, hormonal and neurological nature. Associated the concept terms, the associated with of left with the cognitive functions of the brain, is lateralisation of functions.
- Full Text:
Kognisie, hemisferiese taalverteenwoordiging en lateraliteit by dislektiese seuns
- Authors: Pelser, Marié E.
- Date: 2014-05-08
- Subjects: Dyslexic children , Cognition in children , Cerebral dominance , Laterality
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:10973 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/10546
- Description: M.A. (Psychology) , The goal of the present study was to determine whether there exist any differences in cognitive skills between left-handed dyslexic boys and righthanded dyslexic boys with left hemisphere speech representation. The comparison was made in terms of their verbal and visuo-spatial skills. The motivation for this study resulted from a hypothesis that was formulated by Geschwind and Behan (1982). The hypothesis states that there exists a difference in functional hemispheric asymmetry between left-handed and righthanded dyslexic boys with left hemispheric language representation. By virtue of their explanation of dyslexia in terms of a prenatal hyper secretion of the hormone called testosterone, Geschwind and Behan state that left-handed dyslexic boys will perform better than right-handed dyslexic boys on visuospatial tasks. An empirical study was performed in order to compare the verbal and visuospatial skills of left-handed and right-handed dyslexic boys. Twenty-six lefthanded and 26 right-handed dyslexic boys served as the experimental subjects. All the subjects had left hemispheric language representation. The selection of the experimental subjects was done by means of the dichotic listening technique as well as with the Harris test of lateral dominance. The nine subtests of the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised served as measuring-instrument. The first five subscales represented the verbal cognitive skills. The visuo-spatial skills were measured with subtests six to nine. The data were statistically analysed by means of Hotelling's T2-test and Student's t-tests. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between left-handed and right-handed dyslexic boys with left hemispheric language representation in terms of any of the verbal and visuo-spatial subtests. The relationship between hand preference, functional hemispheric asymmetry and dyslexia is elucidated by the present study which rejects the GeschwindBehan hypothesis that there exists a difference in functional hemispheric asymmetry between left-handed and right-handed dyslexic boys. A previous study (Hugdahl et aI., 1989) accepted this hypothesis. Further research is thus necessary in order to determine the validity of the Geschwind-Behan hypothesis.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Pelser, Marié E.
- Date: 2014-05-08
- Subjects: Dyslexic children , Cognition in children , Cerebral dominance , Laterality
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:10973 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/10546
- Description: M.A. (Psychology) , The goal of the present study was to determine whether there exist any differences in cognitive skills between left-handed dyslexic boys and righthanded dyslexic boys with left hemisphere speech representation. The comparison was made in terms of their verbal and visuo-spatial skills. The motivation for this study resulted from a hypothesis that was formulated by Geschwind and Behan (1982). The hypothesis states that there exists a difference in functional hemispheric asymmetry between left-handed and righthanded dyslexic boys with left hemispheric language representation. By virtue of their explanation of dyslexia in terms of a prenatal hyper secretion of the hormone called testosterone, Geschwind and Behan state that left-handed dyslexic boys will perform better than right-handed dyslexic boys on visuospatial tasks. An empirical study was performed in order to compare the verbal and visuospatial skills of left-handed and right-handed dyslexic boys. Twenty-six lefthanded and 26 right-handed dyslexic boys served as the experimental subjects. All the subjects had left hemispheric language representation. The selection of the experimental subjects was done by means of the dichotic listening technique as well as with the Harris test of lateral dominance. The nine subtests of the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised served as measuring-instrument. The first five subscales represented the verbal cognitive skills. The visuo-spatial skills were measured with subtests six to nine. The data were statistically analysed by means of Hotelling's T2-test and Student's t-tests. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between left-handed and right-handed dyslexic boys with left hemispheric language representation in terms of any of the verbal and visuo-spatial subtests. The relationship between hand preference, functional hemispheric asymmetry and dyslexia is elucidated by the present study which rejects the GeschwindBehan hypothesis that there exists a difference in functional hemispheric asymmetry between left-handed and right-handed dyslexic boys. A previous study (Hugdahl et aI., 1989) accepted this hypothesis. Further research is thus necessary in order to determine the validity of the Geschwind-Behan hypothesis.
- Full Text:
Lateraliteit en hemisferiese taalverteenwoordiging by seuns met en sonder aandagtekort-hiperaktiwiteitsversteuring
- Authors: Vermooten, Irene
- Date: 2008-11-14T14:18:04Z
- Subjects: Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder , Etiology , Attention-deficit-disordered children , Boys' psychology , Psycholinguistics , Laterality , Localization of brain functions , Cerebral dominance , Cerebral hemispheres
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:14685 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/1679
- Description: M.A. , The study aims to determine whether statistically significant differences exist between boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and boys without ADHD with regard to hemispheric language lateralization and the laterality of various modalities (handedness, eyedness and footedness). According to the literature, a possible connection exists between abnormal lateralization patterns and various developmental disorders (Corballis, 1983; Geschwind & Behan, 1982; Hiscock, 1988, McFarland, 1981; Turkewitz, 1988). Lateralization in the current study refers to hemispheric language specialisation, hand dominance, foot dominance and eye dominance. In most people these functions are lateralized to the one side of the body by the age of seven (Kalat, 1995; Kolb & Whishaw, 1996). They typically manifest a dominant left hemisphere for language and a right-sided dominance for handedness, footedness and eyedness. The result is a dominant left hemisphere, due to the left side of the brain controlling the right side of the body. Some children however manifest insufficient or poor lateralization of these functions. For purposes of this study, it would imply that the functions of language specialisation, handedness, footedness and eyedness are not all lateralized to one side of the body. A possible connection between this poor or insufficient lateralization and ADHD might exist. According to the DSM IV (1997) the essential feature of ADHD is a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity that is more frequent and severe than is typically observed in individuals at a comparable level of development. Some of these symptoms causing impairment must have been present before age seven, although many individuals are only diagnosed after the symptoms have been present for a number of years. Impairment resulting from the symptoms should be present in at least two settings, for example, at school and at home. Clear evidence must exist of interference with developmentally appropriate social, academic, or occupational functioning. An empirical study was conducted in order to compare the hemispheric language specialisation, handedness, eyedness and footedness of the various subjects. The subjects consisted of 20 ADHD boys (8 -12 years) who met the criteria of the DSM IV and 20 Non-ADHD boys (8-12 years) without any learning problems. Various interference variables were controlled in the selection of the subjects (see section 5.2.3) Kimura's dichotic listening technique was used to measure hemispheric language specialisation and the Harris-test for Lateral Dominance was used to measure handedness, eyedness and footedness. Wilks's lambda, Pearson's chi-quadrant and Student's t-tests were used during statistical analysis of data. Results indicated statistically significant differences between ADHD boys and non-ADHD boys with regard to hemispheric language specialisation, handedness and footedness. Overall, the results indicated that the ADHD boys are not as strongly lateralized as the non-ADHD boys. The non-ADHD boys showed a stronger left hemispheric language specialisation, right hand dominance and right foot dominance. No statistical differences were recorded with regard to eyedness. The current study provides possible theoretical support for the theory that a connection exists between poor or insufficient lateralization patterns and children with ADHD. However, the study only focused on white boys between the ages of 8-12 years. Further studies involving different age groups, cultures and gender are recommended.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Vermooten, Irene
- Date: 2008-11-14T14:18:04Z
- Subjects: Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder , Etiology , Attention-deficit-disordered children , Boys' psychology , Psycholinguistics , Laterality , Localization of brain functions , Cerebral dominance , Cerebral hemispheres
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:14685 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/1679
- Description: M.A. , The study aims to determine whether statistically significant differences exist between boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and boys without ADHD with regard to hemispheric language lateralization and the laterality of various modalities (handedness, eyedness and footedness). According to the literature, a possible connection exists between abnormal lateralization patterns and various developmental disorders (Corballis, 1983; Geschwind & Behan, 1982; Hiscock, 1988, McFarland, 1981; Turkewitz, 1988). Lateralization in the current study refers to hemispheric language specialisation, hand dominance, foot dominance and eye dominance. In most people these functions are lateralized to the one side of the body by the age of seven (Kalat, 1995; Kolb & Whishaw, 1996). They typically manifest a dominant left hemisphere for language and a right-sided dominance for handedness, footedness and eyedness. The result is a dominant left hemisphere, due to the left side of the brain controlling the right side of the body. Some children however manifest insufficient or poor lateralization of these functions. For purposes of this study, it would imply that the functions of language specialisation, handedness, footedness and eyedness are not all lateralized to one side of the body. A possible connection between this poor or insufficient lateralization and ADHD might exist. According to the DSM IV (1997) the essential feature of ADHD is a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity that is more frequent and severe than is typically observed in individuals at a comparable level of development. Some of these symptoms causing impairment must have been present before age seven, although many individuals are only diagnosed after the symptoms have been present for a number of years. Impairment resulting from the symptoms should be present in at least two settings, for example, at school and at home. Clear evidence must exist of interference with developmentally appropriate social, academic, or occupational functioning. An empirical study was conducted in order to compare the hemispheric language specialisation, handedness, eyedness and footedness of the various subjects. The subjects consisted of 20 ADHD boys (8 -12 years) who met the criteria of the DSM IV and 20 Non-ADHD boys (8-12 years) without any learning problems. Various interference variables were controlled in the selection of the subjects (see section 5.2.3) Kimura's dichotic listening technique was used to measure hemispheric language specialisation and the Harris-test for Lateral Dominance was used to measure handedness, eyedness and footedness. Wilks's lambda, Pearson's chi-quadrant and Student's t-tests were used during statistical analysis of data. Results indicated statistically significant differences between ADHD boys and non-ADHD boys with regard to hemispheric language specialisation, handedness and footedness. Overall, the results indicated that the ADHD boys are not as strongly lateralized as the non-ADHD boys. The non-ADHD boys showed a stronger left hemispheric language specialisation, right hand dominance and right foot dominance. No statistical differences were recorded with regard to eyedness. The current study provides possible theoretical support for the theory that a connection exists between poor or insufficient lateralization patterns and children with ADHD. However, the study only focused on white boys between the ages of 8-12 years. Further studies involving different age groups, cultures and gender are recommended.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »