The effects of sacroiliac manipulative therapy versus functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation on improving hamstring flexibility
- Authors: Gouws, Estelle
- Date: 2015-07-14
- Subjects: Hamstring muscle , Sacroiliac joint , Joints - Range of motion , Manipulation (Therapeutics) , Chiropractic
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:13725 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/13991
- Description: M.Tech. (Chiropractic) , Background: In sporting activity, especially rugby, soccer, cricket and hockey, re-occurring hamstring injuries are a common sight that suggests that there is an opening for an improvement in the treatment and management of these injuries. This can be debilitating to any sportsman as it results in recurrent time away from his/her sporting activity. A study by Fyfer, Yelverton and Sher (2005), found that sacroiliac manipulation alone had a positive effect in the treatment of recurrent hamstring injuries. Cibuklka, Rose, Delitto and Sinacore (1986), proposed a possible link between hamstring muscle injuries and sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A study conducted by Donahue, Docherty and Schrader (2010), on the effects of Graston technique on pressure pain threshold, revealed a significant improvement in the patient’s pain threshold due to the fact that the instrument assisted technique effectively broke down scar tissue and correct fascial restrictions. The FAKTR approach to soft tissue dysfunction combines instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (Graston Technique) with proprioceptive (functional) techniques to reduce pain and return to function (Hyde and Doerr, 2012). Objective: This blinded, randomised pilot study was done to investigate the effects of sacroiliac joint manipulative therapy versus functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation on hamstring flexibility in previously injured hamstring muscle. Design: The study consisted of 30 participants recruited from the University of Johannesburg by word of mouth and posters, which met the inclusion criteria. They were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 received chiropractic therapy of the sacroiliac joint. Group 2 received functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation. Objective measurements consisted of digital inclinometer which measured the flexibility and range of motion of the hamstring muscle. The pressure algometry was used to measure pain pressure threshold. Procedure: Both group participants hamstring flexibility and ranges of motion were tested. Group 1 participants were motion palpated to determine sacroiliac joint dysfunction and treated with a high velocity, low amplitude trust to restricted segment, group 2 received functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation. Results: The statistical results should be viewed with regards that this study only represent a small group of thirty participants and therefore no assumption can be made with respect to whole population. The p-value was set at 0.05 and represents the level of significance of the results. If the p-value was less or equal to 0.05 (p≤0.05) there was a statistical significance finding. If the p-value is greater than 0.05 (p>0.05) vi there was no statistical finding. Statistical significance only means that a given result is unlikely to have occurred by chance. Analysis included demographic data analysis of age and gender. Objective data were collected using Digital Inclinometer and Pressure Algometry. Intra-group and inter-group analysis was done on straight leg raise, passive knee extension, hip extension, lateral rotation of the hip and medial rotation of the hip. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to determine normality. As normality could not be assumed, non-parametric testing were used to do intra-group analysis. The Non-parametric Friedman test was used to determine if a change occurred over time. As change did occur over time the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was use to determined where the change within each group occurred. The Mann-Whitney U test was also used to determine if any difference between the groups were present at any given time. At the end of the study both test groups showed significant clinical as well as statistical improvement over the three week course of the study. Conclusion: The FAKTR treatment did clinically have the greatest improvement, however the changes seen was not statistically superior to those seen with the sacroiliac joint manipulation treatment. A statistical significant improvement was seen in both treatment protocols, concluding that both the spinal manipulative therapy and the functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation could be proficient protocols in treating hamstring flexibility.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Gouws, Estelle
- Date: 2015-07-14
- Subjects: Hamstring muscle , Sacroiliac joint , Joints - Range of motion , Manipulation (Therapeutics) , Chiropractic
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:13725 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/13991
- Description: M.Tech. (Chiropractic) , Background: In sporting activity, especially rugby, soccer, cricket and hockey, re-occurring hamstring injuries are a common sight that suggests that there is an opening for an improvement in the treatment and management of these injuries. This can be debilitating to any sportsman as it results in recurrent time away from his/her sporting activity. A study by Fyfer, Yelverton and Sher (2005), found that sacroiliac manipulation alone had a positive effect in the treatment of recurrent hamstring injuries. Cibuklka, Rose, Delitto and Sinacore (1986), proposed a possible link between hamstring muscle injuries and sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A study conducted by Donahue, Docherty and Schrader (2010), on the effects of Graston technique on pressure pain threshold, revealed a significant improvement in the patient’s pain threshold due to the fact that the instrument assisted technique effectively broke down scar tissue and correct fascial restrictions. The FAKTR approach to soft tissue dysfunction combines instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (Graston Technique) with proprioceptive (functional) techniques to reduce pain and return to function (Hyde and Doerr, 2012). Objective: This blinded, randomised pilot study was done to investigate the effects of sacroiliac joint manipulative therapy versus functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation on hamstring flexibility in previously injured hamstring muscle. Design: The study consisted of 30 participants recruited from the University of Johannesburg by word of mouth and posters, which met the inclusion criteria. They were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 received chiropractic therapy of the sacroiliac joint. Group 2 received functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation. Objective measurements consisted of digital inclinometer which measured the flexibility and range of motion of the hamstring muscle. The pressure algometry was used to measure pain pressure threshold. Procedure: Both group participants hamstring flexibility and ranges of motion were tested. Group 1 participants were motion palpated to determine sacroiliac joint dysfunction and treated with a high velocity, low amplitude trust to restricted segment, group 2 received functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation. Results: The statistical results should be viewed with regards that this study only represent a small group of thirty participants and therefore no assumption can be made with respect to whole population. The p-value was set at 0.05 and represents the level of significance of the results. If the p-value was less or equal to 0.05 (p≤0.05) there was a statistical significance finding. If the p-value is greater than 0.05 (p>0.05) vi there was no statistical finding. Statistical significance only means that a given result is unlikely to have occurred by chance. Analysis included demographic data analysis of age and gender. Objective data were collected using Digital Inclinometer and Pressure Algometry. Intra-group and inter-group analysis was done on straight leg raise, passive knee extension, hip extension, lateral rotation of the hip and medial rotation of the hip. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to determine normality. As normality could not be assumed, non-parametric testing were used to do intra-group analysis. The Non-parametric Friedman test was used to determine if a change occurred over time. As change did occur over time the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was use to determined where the change within each group occurred. The Mann-Whitney U test was also used to determine if any difference between the groups were present at any given time. At the end of the study both test groups showed significant clinical as well as statistical improvement over the three week course of the study. Conclusion: The FAKTR treatment did clinically have the greatest improvement, however the changes seen was not statistically superior to those seen with the sacroiliac joint manipulation treatment. A statistical significant improvement was seen in both treatment protocols, concluding that both the spinal manipulative therapy and the functional and kinetic treatment with rehabilitation could be proficient protocols in treating hamstring flexibility.
- Full Text:
The effect of chiropractic cervical spine adjustment on cervical range of motion, beyond the direct effect of cavitation
- Authors: Paton, Glen James
- Date: 2014-04-01
- Subjects: Chiropractic , Spinal adjustment , Joints - Range of motion , Cervical vertebrae
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:4564 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/9912
- Description: M.Tech. (Chiropractic) , Purpose: This study aims to ascertain the extent Chiropractic manipulative therapy increases ROM beyond the joint-separation induced ROM initially experienced via the cavitation phenomenon in the absence of neck pain. Method: Sixty participants between eighteen and thirty-five years of age, thirty male and thirty female whom met the inclusion of no neck pain and perceived decreased ROM were selected for participation. There was a single group with each participant‟s pre-adjustment readings acting as a baseline. Procedure: Participants were assessed for hypomobility and joint dysfunction. Those who met the inclusion criteria underwent a detailed history, physical and cervical spine regional examination on the initial consult. A pre-adjustment objective measurement was acquired using a cervical spine range of motion (CROM) device. Once the consent form was signed participants received Chiropractic cervical spine manipulative therapy to the area/s of the cervical spine found to be restricted on motion palpation by the researcher. Post-adjustment objective measurements were taken at one, twenty, forty and sixty minutes using the CROM device. Participants were required to remain in the researcher‟s examination room for 60 minutes post-adjustment with continuation of regular day to day activity and no strenuous activity during the twenty-four hour period of the study. The participant was required to return for a single follow up visit within a time frame of twenty-four hours of the initial visit. The follow-up visit required no treatment. At twenty-four hours, the participant was objectively measured for cervical spine ROM using the CROM. The results were based on objective data in the form of cervical spine ROM measurements. Results: Clinical analysis of the percentage change in cervical spine ROM values revealed that clinically and statistically significant improvement was seen in all ranges of motion post-adjustment. General consensus showed that a peak value of improved ROM was seen post-adjustment at the one minute interval for all ranges of motion except flexion. Flexion demonstrated a peak ROM value at the twenty minute post-adjustment interval.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Paton, Glen James
- Date: 2014-04-01
- Subjects: Chiropractic , Spinal adjustment , Joints - Range of motion , Cervical vertebrae
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:4564 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/9912
- Description: M.Tech. (Chiropractic) , Purpose: This study aims to ascertain the extent Chiropractic manipulative therapy increases ROM beyond the joint-separation induced ROM initially experienced via the cavitation phenomenon in the absence of neck pain. Method: Sixty participants between eighteen and thirty-five years of age, thirty male and thirty female whom met the inclusion of no neck pain and perceived decreased ROM were selected for participation. There was a single group with each participant‟s pre-adjustment readings acting as a baseline. Procedure: Participants were assessed for hypomobility and joint dysfunction. Those who met the inclusion criteria underwent a detailed history, physical and cervical spine regional examination on the initial consult. A pre-adjustment objective measurement was acquired using a cervical spine range of motion (CROM) device. Once the consent form was signed participants received Chiropractic cervical spine manipulative therapy to the area/s of the cervical spine found to be restricted on motion palpation by the researcher. Post-adjustment objective measurements were taken at one, twenty, forty and sixty minutes using the CROM device. Participants were required to remain in the researcher‟s examination room for 60 minutes post-adjustment with continuation of regular day to day activity and no strenuous activity during the twenty-four hour period of the study. The participant was required to return for a single follow up visit within a time frame of twenty-four hours of the initial visit. The follow-up visit required no treatment. At twenty-four hours, the participant was objectively measured for cervical spine ROM using the CROM. The results were based on objective data in the form of cervical spine ROM measurements. Results: Clinical analysis of the percentage change in cervical spine ROM values revealed that clinically and statistically significant improvement was seen in all ranges of motion post-adjustment. General consensus showed that a peak value of improved ROM was seen post-adjustment at the one minute interval for all ranges of motion except flexion. Flexion demonstrated a peak ROM value at the twenty minute post-adjustment interval.
- Full Text:
To determine the effectiveness of a chiropractic adjustment on the speed of a soccer ball in soccer players with lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunction
- Authors: Rebelo, Ricardo Jorge Silva
- Date: 2012-09-05
- Subjects: Soccer injuries - Chiropractic treatment , Biomechanics , Joints - Range of motion , Chiropractic
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:3582 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/6964
- Description: M.Tech. , Soccer is the most widely played sport in the world and, of all the skills required to participate, the instep soccer kick is considered to be the primary offensive action within the game of soccer. Biomechanical analysis of the instep soccer kick has revealed that the action of kicking is characterised by a proximal to distal series of multi-articular movements with distal segmental movements being predetermined by more proximal ones (Kellis and Katis, 2007). According to Smith, Gilleard, Hammond and Brooks (2006), the lower spine and pelvis play a pivotal role in determining the placement and actions of distal segmental motion during the action of the instep soccer kick. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of chiropractic adjustments in soccer players with lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunctions by assessing the resultant speed of a soccer ball once kicked with an instep soccer kick. By correcting the lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunction of the affected soccer players, it was postulated that with restoration of joint motion and reduction of pain, the speed of the soccer ball, when kicked, would improve. When kicked the resultant ball speed is indicative of biomechanical kicking success. Thirty male professional soccer players from the Jomo Cosmos football establishment who met the study’s selection criteria were selected and randomly divided into one of two groups. The study group received chiropractic adjustments of dysfunctional lumbar facets and sacroiliac joints and the control group received a placebo treatment in form of a de-tuned stationary ultra-sound head over the effected facets joints for five minutes. Treatment for both groups occurred over a two week period with treatment being administered twice a week, totalling of four treatments per participant. Data capture was collected 3 times over the 2-week period; 1st reading done before the 1st treatment, the 2nd reading before the 3rd treatment and the final reading taken after the 4th and final treatment. Data capture consisted of both subjective and objective readings. The subjective data consisted of the measurements of pain experienced by the participants in the form of a Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Objective data involved the measurement of ball speed once kicked, with the use of a radar speed gun as well as lumbar spine range of motion measurements by means of a Digital Inclinometer. In executing the group comparisons, it was found that both groups would present with contrasting results. The group undergoing the chiropractic adjustments would show an improvement in their ball speed, reduction in their overall pain and increased lumbar spine extension and rotation ROM; where as the group undergoing the placebo treatment experienced a decrease in their ball speed, an increase in their overall pain and decreased lumbar spine ROM. The results obtained from the study demonstrated that the majority of the data was not statistically significant in either of the groups however, from a clinical perspective there was a definite effect on the lumbar spine range of motion, ball speed and pain reduction as a result of the Chiropractic adjustments that would warrant further investigation. There is a definite link with the negative effects that lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunctions have on the proximal to distal sequence of events that take place during the instep soccer kick. Therefore, treating the lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunction with chiropractic adjustments allows for better transfer of energy between segments and for greater resultant ball speed. In conclusion, the study demonstrated that chiropractic adjustment of lumbar facet and Sacroiliac joint dysfunctions showed good improvement in the resultant ball speed, reduction in lower back pain and improved lumbar spine extension and rotation ROM. From these results, it would be prudent to incorporate more chiropractic treatment into mainstream soccer and encourage further research into the advantages that chiropractic treatment has in better understanding the biomechanics involved in the instep soccer kick.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Rebelo, Ricardo Jorge Silva
- Date: 2012-09-05
- Subjects: Soccer injuries - Chiropractic treatment , Biomechanics , Joints - Range of motion , Chiropractic
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:3582 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/6964
- Description: M.Tech. , Soccer is the most widely played sport in the world and, of all the skills required to participate, the instep soccer kick is considered to be the primary offensive action within the game of soccer. Biomechanical analysis of the instep soccer kick has revealed that the action of kicking is characterised by a proximal to distal series of multi-articular movements with distal segmental movements being predetermined by more proximal ones (Kellis and Katis, 2007). According to Smith, Gilleard, Hammond and Brooks (2006), the lower spine and pelvis play a pivotal role in determining the placement and actions of distal segmental motion during the action of the instep soccer kick. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of chiropractic adjustments in soccer players with lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunctions by assessing the resultant speed of a soccer ball once kicked with an instep soccer kick. By correcting the lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunction of the affected soccer players, it was postulated that with restoration of joint motion and reduction of pain, the speed of the soccer ball, when kicked, would improve. When kicked the resultant ball speed is indicative of biomechanical kicking success. Thirty male professional soccer players from the Jomo Cosmos football establishment who met the study’s selection criteria were selected and randomly divided into one of two groups. The study group received chiropractic adjustments of dysfunctional lumbar facets and sacroiliac joints and the control group received a placebo treatment in form of a de-tuned stationary ultra-sound head over the effected facets joints for five minutes. Treatment for both groups occurred over a two week period with treatment being administered twice a week, totalling of four treatments per participant. Data capture was collected 3 times over the 2-week period; 1st reading done before the 1st treatment, the 2nd reading before the 3rd treatment and the final reading taken after the 4th and final treatment. Data capture consisted of both subjective and objective readings. The subjective data consisted of the measurements of pain experienced by the participants in the form of a Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Objective data involved the measurement of ball speed once kicked, with the use of a radar speed gun as well as lumbar spine range of motion measurements by means of a Digital Inclinometer. In executing the group comparisons, it was found that both groups would present with contrasting results. The group undergoing the chiropractic adjustments would show an improvement in their ball speed, reduction in their overall pain and increased lumbar spine extension and rotation ROM; where as the group undergoing the placebo treatment experienced a decrease in their ball speed, an increase in their overall pain and decreased lumbar spine ROM. The results obtained from the study demonstrated that the majority of the data was not statistically significant in either of the groups however, from a clinical perspective there was a definite effect on the lumbar spine range of motion, ball speed and pain reduction as a result of the Chiropractic adjustments that would warrant further investigation. There is a definite link with the negative effects that lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunctions have on the proximal to distal sequence of events that take place during the instep soccer kick. Therefore, treating the lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint dysfunction with chiropractic adjustments allows for better transfer of energy between segments and for greater resultant ball speed. In conclusion, the study demonstrated that chiropractic adjustment of lumbar facet and Sacroiliac joint dysfunctions showed good improvement in the resultant ball speed, reduction in lower back pain and improved lumbar spine extension and rotation ROM. From these results, it would be prudent to incorporate more chiropractic treatment into mainstream soccer and encourage further research into the advantages that chiropractic treatment has in better understanding the biomechanics involved in the instep soccer kick.
- Full Text:
The immediate effect of manipulation of the talocrural, proximal tibiofibular joints and the combination thereof on ankle dorsiflexion
- Authors: Ritter, Jacques
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Chiropractic , Ankle , Joints - Range of motion
- Language: English
- Type: Masters (Thesis)
- Identifier: http://ujcontent.uj.ac.za8080/10210/387544 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/292964 , uj:31846
- Description: Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effects of a combined talocrural and proximal tibiofibular manipulation on ankle dorsiflexion with a control as well as with the effects of manipulation of each joint in isolation. Method: The study consisted of 100 asymptomatic participants. The participants were divided into four groups each comprising 25. Participants had to meet the inclusion criteria to be considered for the study and also had to present with no contra-indications for peripheral manipulation. Procedure: Group 1 received a single talocrural manipulation. Group 2 received a single proximal tibiofibular manipulation. Group 3 received both a talocrural as well as proximal tibiofibular manipulation. Group 4 did not receive any intervention and served as the control group. The talocrural dorsiflexion was measured using the weight-bearing lunge test. Measurements were taken prior to the intervention and immediately afterwards. The data was recorded by the researcher. Once the trials were completed, the results were sent to STATKON to be analysed. Results: The manipulated limbs of Groups 1, 2 and 3 all showed an increase in ankle dorsiflexion. Group 3 showed the biggest improvement. Group 4 showed no statistically significant improvement. Conclusion: It was found that all the groups that received intervention in the form of joint manipulation improved. Statistically, they had the same improvement, yet clinically it appeared that Group 3 had some additive effect. Although an increase was also noted in the unmanipulated limbs, such an increase across all analyses of unmanipulated limbs was so small it can be argued to be negligible. It could be said that manipulation of the proximal tibiofibular joint, talocrural joint or both has an immediate increase in dorsiflexion of the ankle. , M.Tech. (Chiropractic)
- Full Text:
- Authors: Ritter, Jacques
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Chiropractic , Ankle , Joints - Range of motion
- Language: English
- Type: Masters (Thesis)
- Identifier: http://ujcontent.uj.ac.za8080/10210/387544 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/292964 , uj:31846
- Description: Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effects of a combined talocrural and proximal tibiofibular manipulation on ankle dorsiflexion with a control as well as with the effects of manipulation of each joint in isolation. Method: The study consisted of 100 asymptomatic participants. The participants were divided into four groups each comprising 25. Participants had to meet the inclusion criteria to be considered for the study and also had to present with no contra-indications for peripheral manipulation. Procedure: Group 1 received a single talocrural manipulation. Group 2 received a single proximal tibiofibular manipulation. Group 3 received both a talocrural as well as proximal tibiofibular manipulation. Group 4 did not receive any intervention and served as the control group. The talocrural dorsiflexion was measured using the weight-bearing lunge test. Measurements were taken prior to the intervention and immediately afterwards. The data was recorded by the researcher. Once the trials were completed, the results were sent to STATKON to be analysed. Results: The manipulated limbs of Groups 1, 2 and 3 all showed an increase in ankle dorsiflexion. Group 3 showed the biggest improvement. Group 4 showed no statistically significant improvement. Conclusion: It was found that all the groups that received intervention in the form of joint manipulation improved. Statistically, they had the same improvement, yet clinically it appeared that Group 3 had some additive effect. Although an increase was also noted in the unmanipulated limbs, such an increase across all analyses of unmanipulated limbs was so small it can be argued to be negligible. It could be said that manipulation of the proximal tibiofibular joint, talocrural joint or both has an immediate increase in dorsiflexion of the ankle. , M.Tech. (Chiropractic)
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »