The efficacy of Phosphorus 6CH in treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- Authors: Cockcroft, Donna Kathryn
- Date: 2008-09-01T10:25:16Z
- Subjects: Attention-deficit-disordered children , Homeopathic treatment of hyperactive children
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: http://ujcontent.uj.ac.za8080/10210/366408 , uj:4469 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/980
- Description: This research was conducted to determine the effect of Phosphorus 6CH on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Phosphorus 6CH is a simplex homoeopathic preparation that through repertorisation of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria of ADHD is found to be well indicated for this disorder. Homoeopathic trials have been conducted previously on complex homoeopathic preparations (Strauss, 1998; Smith, 2001) and have shown overall improvements in the symptoms of ADHD. The use of a simplex homoeopathic remedy has not been effectively documented prior to 2004. ADHD is a commonly diagnosed childhood disorder characterised by inattention, impulsivity, and possibly hyperactivity. Current management of this disorder is predominantly through the use of highly scheduled central nervous system stimulants, which may produce unwanted and serious side effects, and in some children may produce no response at all. A double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial was conducted. Children between seven and eleven years of age with pre-diagnosed ADHD and taking no other medication for the disorder were included in the trial. Children were randomly assigned to either the medication or the placebo groups. Evaluations were conducted by means of the Barkley and DuPaul Teacher Rating Scale (BDTRS), completed by the child’s teacher, the Parent Symptom Questionnaire (PSQ), completed by the child’s parent or guardian, and the Children’s Checking Task (CCT), completed by the child. Evaluation was conducted before the trial, weekly after two weeks of liquid administration, and again a week after cessation of treatment. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in both the BDTRS and the PSQ scores, with the placebo group also showing improvement, although not to as significant a degree as the experimental group. In the CCT, no significant improvement was seen in the total scores of the tests, although there was significant improvement in the time taken to complete the tests. Because of the placebo effect having a large influence on the results of the study, more effective research would need to be done in order to establish whether Phosphorus did in fact account for the more significant improvement found in the experimental group. Further studies need to be conducted on the effect of homeopathic remedies such as Phosphorus, with variable dosage and potency being used. Since all children in the study showed a marked improvement due to the high level of attention met on each child by the teachers and parents involved, it is worth considering a study where no medication is used at all, but where children are given individualised attention and encouragement. It would be a valuable way to assess whether this attention would be sufficient to produce marked improvement in the children over a sustained period of time, or whether the attention given would ultimately no longer be enough but would have to be supplemented with medication. , Dr. Joanne Roohani Mrs. Carolina Henn
- Full Text:
- Authors: Cockcroft, Donna Kathryn
- Date: 2008-09-01T10:25:16Z
- Subjects: Attention-deficit-disordered children , Homeopathic treatment of hyperactive children
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: http://ujcontent.uj.ac.za8080/10210/366408 , uj:4469 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/980
- Description: This research was conducted to determine the effect of Phosphorus 6CH on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Phosphorus 6CH is a simplex homoeopathic preparation that through repertorisation of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria of ADHD is found to be well indicated for this disorder. Homoeopathic trials have been conducted previously on complex homoeopathic preparations (Strauss, 1998; Smith, 2001) and have shown overall improvements in the symptoms of ADHD. The use of a simplex homoeopathic remedy has not been effectively documented prior to 2004. ADHD is a commonly diagnosed childhood disorder characterised by inattention, impulsivity, and possibly hyperactivity. Current management of this disorder is predominantly through the use of highly scheduled central nervous system stimulants, which may produce unwanted and serious side effects, and in some children may produce no response at all. A double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial was conducted. Children between seven and eleven years of age with pre-diagnosed ADHD and taking no other medication for the disorder were included in the trial. Children were randomly assigned to either the medication or the placebo groups. Evaluations were conducted by means of the Barkley and DuPaul Teacher Rating Scale (BDTRS), completed by the child’s teacher, the Parent Symptom Questionnaire (PSQ), completed by the child’s parent or guardian, and the Children’s Checking Task (CCT), completed by the child. Evaluation was conducted before the trial, weekly after two weeks of liquid administration, and again a week after cessation of treatment. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in both the BDTRS and the PSQ scores, with the placebo group also showing improvement, although not to as significant a degree as the experimental group. In the CCT, no significant improvement was seen in the total scores of the tests, although there was significant improvement in the time taken to complete the tests. Because of the placebo effect having a large influence on the results of the study, more effective research would need to be done in order to establish whether Phosphorus did in fact account for the more significant improvement found in the experimental group. Further studies need to be conducted on the effect of homeopathic remedies such as Phosphorus, with variable dosage and potency being used. Since all children in the study showed a marked improvement due to the high level of attention met on each child by the teachers and parents involved, it is worth considering a study where no medication is used at all, but where children are given individualised attention and encouragement. It would be a valuable way to assess whether this attention would be sufficient to produce marked improvement in the children over a sustained period of time, or whether the attention given would ultimately no longer be enough but would have to be supplemented with medication. , Dr. Joanne Roohani Mrs. Carolina Henn
- Full Text:
Lateraliteit en hemisferiese taalverteenwoordiging by seuns met en sonder aandagtekort-hiperaktiwiteitsversteuring
- Authors: Vermooten, Irene
- Date: 2008-11-14T14:18:04Z
- Subjects: Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder , Etiology , Attention-deficit-disordered children , Boys' psychology , Psycholinguistics , Laterality , Localization of brain functions , Cerebral dominance , Cerebral hemispheres
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:14685 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/1679
- Description: M.A. , The study aims to determine whether statistically significant differences exist between boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and boys without ADHD with regard to hemispheric language lateralization and the laterality of various modalities (handedness, eyedness and footedness). According to the literature, a possible connection exists between abnormal lateralization patterns and various developmental disorders (Corballis, 1983; Geschwind & Behan, 1982; Hiscock, 1988, McFarland, 1981; Turkewitz, 1988). Lateralization in the current study refers to hemispheric language specialisation, hand dominance, foot dominance and eye dominance. In most people these functions are lateralized to the one side of the body by the age of seven (Kalat, 1995; Kolb & Whishaw, 1996). They typically manifest a dominant left hemisphere for language and a right-sided dominance for handedness, footedness and eyedness. The result is a dominant left hemisphere, due to the left side of the brain controlling the right side of the body. Some children however manifest insufficient or poor lateralization of these functions. For purposes of this study, it would imply that the functions of language specialisation, handedness, footedness and eyedness are not all lateralized to one side of the body. A possible connection between this poor or insufficient lateralization and ADHD might exist. According to the DSM IV (1997) the essential feature of ADHD is a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity that is more frequent and severe than is typically observed in individuals at a comparable level of development. Some of these symptoms causing impairment must have been present before age seven, although many individuals are only diagnosed after the symptoms have been present for a number of years. Impairment resulting from the symptoms should be present in at least two settings, for example, at school and at home. Clear evidence must exist of interference with developmentally appropriate social, academic, or occupational functioning. An empirical study was conducted in order to compare the hemispheric language specialisation, handedness, eyedness and footedness of the various subjects. The subjects consisted of 20 ADHD boys (8 -12 years) who met the criteria of the DSM IV and 20 Non-ADHD boys (8-12 years) without any learning problems. Various interference variables were controlled in the selection of the subjects (see section 5.2.3) Kimura's dichotic listening technique was used to measure hemispheric language specialisation and the Harris-test for Lateral Dominance was used to measure handedness, eyedness and footedness. Wilks's lambda, Pearson's chi-quadrant and Student's t-tests were used during statistical analysis of data. Results indicated statistically significant differences between ADHD boys and non-ADHD boys with regard to hemispheric language specialisation, handedness and footedness. Overall, the results indicated that the ADHD boys are not as strongly lateralized as the non-ADHD boys. The non-ADHD boys showed a stronger left hemispheric language specialisation, right hand dominance and right foot dominance. No statistical differences were recorded with regard to eyedness. The current study provides possible theoretical support for the theory that a connection exists between poor or insufficient lateralization patterns and children with ADHD. However, the study only focused on white boys between the ages of 8-12 years. Further studies involving different age groups, cultures and gender are recommended.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Vermooten, Irene
- Date: 2008-11-14T14:18:04Z
- Subjects: Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder , Etiology , Attention-deficit-disordered children , Boys' psychology , Psycholinguistics , Laterality , Localization of brain functions , Cerebral dominance , Cerebral hemispheres
- Type: Thesis
- Identifier: uj:14685 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/1679
- Description: M.A. , The study aims to determine whether statistically significant differences exist between boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and boys without ADHD with regard to hemispheric language lateralization and the laterality of various modalities (handedness, eyedness and footedness). According to the literature, a possible connection exists between abnormal lateralization patterns and various developmental disorders (Corballis, 1983; Geschwind & Behan, 1982; Hiscock, 1988, McFarland, 1981; Turkewitz, 1988). Lateralization in the current study refers to hemispheric language specialisation, hand dominance, foot dominance and eye dominance. In most people these functions are lateralized to the one side of the body by the age of seven (Kalat, 1995; Kolb & Whishaw, 1996). They typically manifest a dominant left hemisphere for language and a right-sided dominance for handedness, footedness and eyedness. The result is a dominant left hemisphere, due to the left side of the brain controlling the right side of the body. Some children however manifest insufficient or poor lateralization of these functions. For purposes of this study, it would imply that the functions of language specialisation, handedness, footedness and eyedness are not all lateralized to one side of the body. A possible connection between this poor or insufficient lateralization and ADHD might exist. According to the DSM IV (1997) the essential feature of ADHD is a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity that is more frequent and severe than is typically observed in individuals at a comparable level of development. Some of these symptoms causing impairment must have been present before age seven, although many individuals are only diagnosed after the symptoms have been present for a number of years. Impairment resulting from the symptoms should be present in at least two settings, for example, at school and at home. Clear evidence must exist of interference with developmentally appropriate social, academic, or occupational functioning. An empirical study was conducted in order to compare the hemispheric language specialisation, handedness, eyedness and footedness of the various subjects. The subjects consisted of 20 ADHD boys (8 -12 years) who met the criteria of the DSM IV and 20 Non-ADHD boys (8-12 years) without any learning problems. Various interference variables were controlled in the selection of the subjects (see section 5.2.3) Kimura's dichotic listening technique was used to measure hemispheric language specialisation and the Harris-test for Lateral Dominance was used to measure handedness, eyedness and footedness. Wilks's lambda, Pearson's chi-quadrant and Student's t-tests were used during statistical analysis of data. Results indicated statistically significant differences between ADHD boys and non-ADHD boys with regard to hemispheric language specialisation, handedness and footedness. Overall, the results indicated that the ADHD boys are not as strongly lateralized as the non-ADHD boys. The non-ADHD boys showed a stronger left hemispheric language specialisation, right hand dominance and right foot dominance. No statistical differences were recorded with regard to eyedness. The current study provides possible theoretical support for the theory that a connection exists between poor or insufficient lateralization patterns and children with ADHD. However, the study only focused on white boys between the ages of 8-12 years. Further studies involving different age groups, cultures and gender are recommended.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »