Eutrophication impact potential of solid waste management options in Harare
- Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E., Mbohwa, Charles
- Authors: Nhubu, T. , Muzenda, E. , Mbohwa, Charles
- Date: 2019
- Language: English
- Type: Conference proceedings
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/400405 , uj:33415 , Citation: Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E. & Mbohwa, C. 2019. Eutrophication impact potential of solid waste management options in Harare.
- Description: Abstract: Six municipal solid waste management options (A1– A6) in Harare were devel-oped and analyzed for their eutrophication impact potentials under the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. All the options started with waste collection and transportation to a cen-tralized waste treatment centre where a combination of various municipal solid waste manage-ment and treatment methods were considered under the different options. Results show that landfilling and material recovery for reuse and recyle are the only MSW management processes that contributes to negative eutrophication potential giving options that had landfilling (A1, A4 and A6) an overall edge. The doubling of recycling rate under A5 and increasing it to atleast 25% under A6 result in below zero eutrophication impact potentials. Results reveal that anaero-bic digestion and incineration contribute to increased eutrophication potential under all the op-tions they were considered hence need for further assessments considering other impact catego-ries to determine the most sustainable option.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Nhubu, T. , Muzenda, E. , Mbohwa, Charles
- Date: 2019
- Language: English
- Type: Conference proceedings
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/400405 , uj:33415 , Citation: Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E. & Mbohwa, C. 2019. Eutrophication impact potential of solid waste management options in Harare.
- Description: Abstract: Six municipal solid waste management options (A1– A6) in Harare were devel-oped and analyzed for their eutrophication impact potentials under the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. All the options started with waste collection and transportation to a cen-tralized waste treatment centre where a combination of various municipal solid waste manage-ment and treatment methods were considered under the different options. Results show that landfilling and material recovery for reuse and recyle are the only MSW management processes that contributes to negative eutrophication potential giving options that had landfilling (A1, A4 and A6) an overall edge. The doubling of recycling rate under A5 and increasing it to atleast 25% under A6 result in below zero eutrophication impact potentials. Results reveal that anaero-bic digestion and incineration contribute to increased eutrophication potential under all the op-tions they were considered hence need for further assessments considering other impact catego-ries to determine the most sustainable option.
- Full Text:
Eutrophication impact potential of solid waste management options in Harare
- Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E., Mbohwa, Charles
- Authors: Nhubu, T. , Muzenda, E. , Mbohwa, Charles
- Date: 2019
- Language: English
- Type: Conference proceedings
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/400926 , uj:33484 , Citation: Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E. & Mbohwa, C. 2019. Eutrophication impact potential of solid waste management options in Harare.
- Description: Abstract: Six municipal solid waste management options (A1– A6) in Harare were devel-oped and analyzed for their eutrophication impact potentials under the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. All the options started with waste collection and transportation to a cen-tralized waste treatment centre where a combination of various municipal solid waste manage-ment and treatment methods were considered under the different options. Results show that landfilling and material recovery for reuse and recyle are the only MSW management processes that contributes to negative eutrophication potential giving options that had landfilling (A1, A4 and A6) an overall edge. The doubling of recycling rate under A5 and increasing it to atleast 25% under A6 result in below zero eutrophication impact potentials. Results reveal that anaero-bic digestion and incineration contribute to increased eutrophication potential under all the op-tions they were considered hence need for further assessments considering other impact catego-ries to determine the most sustainable option.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Nhubu, T. , Muzenda, E. , Mbohwa, Charles
- Date: 2019
- Language: English
- Type: Conference proceedings
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/400926 , uj:33484 , Citation: Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E. & Mbohwa, C. 2019. Eutrophication impact potential of solid waste management options in Harare.
- Description: Abstract: Six municipal solid waste management options (A1– A6) in Harare were devel-oped and analyzed for their eutrophication impact potentials under the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. All the options started with waste collection and transportation to a cen-tralized waste treatment centre where a combination of various municipal solid waste manage-ment and treatment methods were considered under the different options. Results show that landfilling and material recovery for reuse and recyle are the only MSW management processes that contributes to negative eutrophication potential giving options that had landfilling (A1, A4 and A6) an overall edge. The doubling of recycling rate under A5 and increasing it to atleast 25% under A6 result in below zero eutrophication impact potentials. Results reveal that anaero-bic digestion and incineration contribute to increased eutrophication potential under all the op-tions they were considered hence need for further assessments considering other impact catego-ries to determine the most sustainable option.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »