Designer's contribution to construction health and safety (H&S) - a case study of a public works project
- Authors: Musonda, I. , Haupt, T.
- Date: 2008
- Subjects: Designers , Health and safety , Performance improvement
- Language: English
- Type: Conference proceedings
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/22581 , uj:16212 , Citation: Musonda, I. & Haupt, T. 2008. Designer's contribution to construction health and safety (H&S) - a case study of a public works project. Conference proceedings of the 3rd Built Environment Conference by Association of Schools of Construction of Southern Africa (ASOCSA 2008), held in Cape Town, South Africa, 6th–8th July 2008. ISBN: 978-0-620-41382
- Description: Abstract: This paper presents findings from a study conducted on a public works’ construction project in Botswana to establish the contribution of designers (consultants) to construction health and safety (H&S)
- Full Text:
Identification of health and safety performance improvement indicators for small and medium construction enterprises: a Delphi consensus study
- Authors: Agumba, Justus N. , Haupt, Theo C.
- Date: 2011-09
- Subjects: Health and safety , Performance improvement , Small and medium construction enterprises , Delphi approach
- Type: Article
- Identifier: uj:5323 , ISSN 2281-4612 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/8234
- Description: This study sought to identify and validate a comprehensive set of health and safety (H&S) leading indicator metrics that will enable small and medium construction enterprises (SMEs) personnel to monitor the level of H&S performance in their projects. The Delphi approach was used where the opinion of H&S experts, academics and industry practitioners were canvassed on 64 potential indicator metrics, categorized in 10 elements or leading indicators that will enable H&S performance improvement e.g. reduction in accidents, injuries, diseases but to name a few. The experts rated each indicator metric on a 10-point Likert scale of impact, where 1= no major impact or 10% impact and 10 = major impact or 100% impact. Consensus was reached on 32 indicator metrics after four successive rounds of Delphi if the indicators attracted final scores of, percentage median impact of 90% to 100% which is 9.00 to 10.00 median rating and over 50% of respondents rating the indicator metrics in the band of 9.00 to 10.00 or 90% to 100% impact to improve H&S performance. The experts had the opportunity to reconsider their scores informed by the group median score in rounds 2, 3 and 4. The limitation of the study was the reliance of a structured questionnaire in the first round as experts were not allowed to add any new indicators, until the fourth round. This study contributes to the H&S body of knowledge where no consensus has been reached pertaining to the indicator metrics that have major impact to improve H&S performance at project level of construction SMEs in South Africa.
- Full Text:
Identification of health and safety performance improvement indicators for small and medium construction enterprises : a Delphi consensus study
- Authors: Agumba, Justus N. , Haupt, Theo C.
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Health and safety , Performance improvement , Small business - Safety measures
- Type: Article
- Identifier: uj:5328 , http://hdl.handle.net/10210/8623
- Description: This study sought to identify and validate a comprehensive set of health and safety (H&S) leading indicator metrics that will enable small and medium construction enterprises (SMEs) personnel to monitor the level of H&S performance in their projects. The Delphi approach was used where the opinion of H&S experts, academics and industry practitioners were canvassed on 64 potential indicator metrics, categorized in 10 elements or leading indicators that will enable H&S performance improvement e.g. reduction in accidents, injuries, diseases but to name a few. The experts rated each indicator metric on a 10-point Likert scale of impact, where 1= no major impact or 10% impact and 10 = major impact or 100% impact. Consensus was reached on 32 indicator metrics after four successive rounds of Delphi if the indicators attracted final scores of, percentage median impact of 90% to 100% which is 9.00 to 10.00 median rating and over 50% of respondents rating the indicator metrics in the band of 9.00 to 10.00 or 90% to 100% impact to improve H&S performance. The experts had the opportunity to reconsider their scores informed by the group median score in rounds 2, 3 and 4. The limitation of the study was the reliance of a structured questionnaire in the first round as experts were not allowed to add any new indicators, until the fourth round. This study contributes to the H&S body of knowledge where no consensus has been reached pertaining to the indicator metrics that have major impact to improve H&S performance at project level of construction SMEs in South Africa.
- Full Text:
Quality performance of infrastructure developments in Swaziland
- Authors: Oke, Ayodeji , Aigbavboa, Clinton , Dlamini, Ernest
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Construction project , Performance improvement , Project performance
- Language: English
- Type: Conference proceedings
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/240886 , uj:24790 , Citation: Oke, A., Aigbavboa, C. & Dlamini, E. 2017. Quality performance of infrastructure developments in Swaziland. ICIDA 2017 - 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA - 12-14 April 2017, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana.
- Description: Abstract: Please refer to full text to view abstract
- Full Text:
Maximising training evaluation for employee performance improvement
- Authors: Mehale, Kaledi D. , Govender, Cookie M. , Mabaso, Calvin M.
- Date: 2021
- Subjects: Human resource development , Training evaluation tools , Performance improvement
- Language: English
- Type: Article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/480748 , uj:43531 , Citation: Mehale, K.D., Govender, C.M., & Mabaso, C.M. (2021). Maximising training evaluation for employee performance improvement. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/ SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 19(0), a1473. https://doi. org/10.4102/sajhrm. v19i0.1473
- Description: Abstract: Orientation: Employee performance is a vital aspect within organisations in South Africa (SA). It is argued that poor performance can be addressed through training and development. Performances should be evaluated before and after training interventions to ensure that training was beneficial to the employees. Research purpose: The study intended to establish whether training evaluation conducted after training in the SA financial sector measures employee performance improvement. Motivation for the study: Most businesses invest in training and development interventions anticipating that employees will use what they have learned to improve their performance. There is limited recent empirical research on SA financial sector training evaluation tools, especially those that indicate employee performance improvement after training. Main findings and discussion: The findings of this study indicate the following: SA financial organisations frequently use levels 1–3 (satisfaction; learning; application) of the Kirkpatrick- Phillips training evaluation tool; continuous employee performance improvement needs to be assessed more regularly, especially after training; and levels 4–5 (results; ROI) of the Kirkpatrick-Phillips evaluation model are seldom measured due to a lack of skills, motivation, and resources. Implications and contribution: There are significant implications for Human Resource Development (HRD) professionals and managers within the SA financial sector. Since there is a positive significant association with training evaluation and employee performance, relevant stakeholders must be aware that the purpose of training must be to improve and measure employee performance. This paper contributes theoretically to HRD management practices, training evaluations, and performance improvement. The practical contribution is the proposed Training Evaluation Framework for Performance Improvement for stakeholders to use to ensure that HRD evaluations measures performance improvement.
- Full Text: