/

GlobalView
  • Change Site
  • GlobalView
  • Research Output
  • Past Exam Papers
  • Special Collections
  • Advanced Search
  • Expert Search
  • Sign In
    • Help
    • Search History
    • Clear Session
  • Browse
    • Entire Repository  
    • Recent Additions
    • Communities & Collections
    • By Title
    • By Creator
    • By Subject
    • By Contributor
    • Most Accessed Papers
    • Most Accessed Items
    • Most Accessed Authors
  • Quick Collection  
Sign In
  • Help
  • Search History
  • Clear Session

MODS Metadata of Profiling disadvantaged undergraduate students in higher education

roleTerm ( text )
author 
namePart
Mpofu, Bhekimpilo 
dateAccessioned
2015-09-02T06:21:57Z 
dateAvailable
2015-09-02T06:21:57Z 
dateIssued
2015 
text
Mpofu, B. 2015. Profiling disadvantaged undergraduate students in higher education. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 6(1):15-30 
identifier ( issn )
09766634 
identifier ( uri )
http://hdl.handle.net/10210/14406 
abstract
The focus of this paper is the academic progress of university students who come from disadvantaged schools. While research has been conducted on students' academic progress at higher education institutions, previous studies were generic in that they treated students as a homogenous group. This study differentiates different groups of students using the quintile system and links this to their academic progress. This study was conducted within the sustainable livelihoods approach and sought to explore three aspects of the population under study: namely, livelihood assets, context, and outcomes both before attending university and during their studies. It measured pre-university assets (such as school quintile) against pre-university outcomes (such as matric scores) and then applied these to university outcomes such as grade point average (GPA) and time to graduation. The results show that low quintile students have much lower average matric scores, achieve a much lower GPA of just 50% and lower, have a much higher dropout rate (of more than 51%) and take longer to achieve a degree (four to seven years for three-year degrees and five to seven years for four-year degrees) than high quintile students. 
languageTerm ( rfc3066 )
en 
publisher
Kamla-Raj 
accessCondition ( useAndReproduction )
©2015, authors 
topic
Academic achievement 
topic
Disadvantaged students 
topic
Quintile system 
topic
Sustainable livelihoods 
title
Profiling disadvantaged undergraduate students in higher education 
genre
Article 

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10210/207154
  • English (United States)
  • English (United States)
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • About Vital

‹ › ×

    Clear Session

    Are you sure you would like to clear your session, including search history and login status?