Abstract
M.A.
Language, specifically the narrative use of language, is not only a medium
through which people express and understand themselves. Language is the
vehicle wherein and whereby personal identity is constituted. Thus, identity is
not seen as fixed, but as a product-in-process of narrative discourse.The
interrelationship between narrative and personal identity can be observed in
a person`s almost inborn urge to mentally reconstruct his lifestory. Narratives
supply personal identity with continuity and cohesion.
Ricoeur`s description of the instance of “mimesis” – narratives are “mimesis”
in the sense of being the representation of an action – is used to explain the
construction of two selfnarratives (Griet Swart in Griet skryf `n sprokie and
Stoffel Mathysen in Die lang pad van Stoffel Mathysen). Ricoeur`s two
“functions” of narrative, i.e. to expose and to transform, are considered.
Griet Swart`s narrative identity is constituted by her being situated in a
tradition (mimesis 1 ) – that of being writer of fairy-tales as well as reader of
literature. Drawing on conventions and prior knowledge, a plot is created
(mimesis 2), in which Griet narrates her lifestory. The narration, the
perspective on a patriarchal society as well as the continuous redefining of
narrative identity by means of the writing process, are examined. The act of
writing becomes metaphor for personal freedom.
In Die lang pad van Stoffel Mathysen the use of the epic hero figure, travel
prose, Western literature, hunting prose and the outobiography are examined
in order to understand Mathysen`s narrative construction of personal identity.
Both Griet and Mathysen reconfigure personal identity by means of narrative.
It is this process of constant change in self-understanding that Ricoeur calls
“narrative identity”.