Abstract
This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell-the logical problem and the evidential problem-we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.