Logo image
The co-production of hydrogen and carbon nanotubes from the gasification of waste tyres and waste biomass - Part I : conceptual design
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The co-production of hydrogen and carbon nanotubes from the gasification of waste tyres and waste biomass - Part I : conceptual design

Lanrewaju I. Fajimi, Bilainu O. Oboirien and Thomas A. Adams II
Chemical engineering research & design, Vol.232, pp.499-514
01/08/2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10210/521652

Abstract

Engineering, Chemical Science & Technology Engineering Technology
In this study, a conceptual production plant design of the co-production of hydrogen and CNT from waste tyres (WT) and waste biomass (WB) gasification was investigated. Key design elements, including feedstock preparation, gasification reactor configuration, and product separation techniques, were explored. The overall process comprises key units which include: the gasification unit, desulphurization units, WGS unit, PSA unit, and CNT synthesis unit. To achieve the objective of this study, five design cases were investigated using different WT:WB ratios. The first and last cases considered 100% gasification using WT and WB, respectively. The second, third, and fourth cases were the co-gasification scenarios, which investigated 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 WT:WB ratios, respectively. The results from the technical analysis show that the first two cases (1 and 2) had the highest product-to-feed ratios for the gasification and co-gasification scenarios. The hydrogen and CNT yields from these cases were 0.198 kgH2/kgFeed & 0.154 kgH2/kgFeed and 0.111 kgCNT /kgFeed, & 0.105 kgCNT /kgFeed, respectively. In addition, the carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) decreased from 98.0% to 92.3% across Cases 1-5, while the hydrogen conversion efficiency (HCE) declined significantly from 85.4% to 22.8%. To further test the other technical aspects of each case, an energy assessment of the process was carried out. In addition, the overall energy efficiencies were 43.2%LHV, 38.5%LHV, 32.5%LHV, 29.7%LHV, and 24.2%LHV, respectively.
pdf
Research (43)6.65 MBDownloadView
Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2026.07.017View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image