Abstract
Language is a political tool used to legitimise, delegitimise, produce and (re)produce
dominance. In Zimbabwe, ZANU-PF advertisements for the July 2013 elections were an
attempt to deploy language to (re)produce dominance. The advertisements were produced
in the context of a power-sharing government comprising ZANU-PF and the MDCs. Adopting
sign theory, the article uses legitimation analysis to explore the ways in which ZANU-PF
used language to retain dominance. Research revealed that ZANU-PF legitimated its
dominance on the basis of performance, for example, implementing the multiple currencies
system after the Zimbabwe dollar’s collapse and delivering a constitution that guarantees
the values espoused by the liberation struggle. Mugabe’s incomparable “wisdom and
deftness” in handling matters of state, ZANU-PF’s care for ordinary urban ratepayers and
economic indigenisation were used to justify the party’s dominance. It also legitimised its rule
by portraying the MDC-T as an uncaring, dishonest and sell-out party, thus delegitimising it
while skilfully concealing its own blame in the collapse of the economy post-2000.