Abstract
Since the 1980s, South African comics have explored resistance history,
with organisations like the South African Committee for Higher Education
(SACHED) producing works to counter apartheid education. Muziwakhe
Nhlabatsi’s Down Second Avenue (1981), a comic adaptation of Es’kia
Mphahlele’s autobiography for SACHED's Upbeat magazine, is a key example.
More recently, Richard Conyngham’s All rise: Resistance and rebellion in
South Africa 1910-1948 (2021) has continued this tradition, highlighting
working-class resistance. One chapter, The widow of Marabastad, illustrated
by Dada Khanyisa, recounts Helena Detody’s defiance of the 1925 night
passes law, leading to a legal victory for black women’s freedom of movement.
Both The widow of Marabastad and Down Second Avenue depict Marabastad,
emphasise women’s roles in resisting injustice, and reflect the distinct styles
of their illustrators. The analysis of drawing styles in graphic histories is
often overlooked despite their importance in historical narratives (Ahmed
2012). In this article, we focus on Khanyisa’s portrayal of the characters and
Marabastad, using Mikkonen’s (2017) writing on narratology in comics. We
specifically examine graphic style and subjectivity, and following an interview
with Khanyisa, we argue that their approach challenges the notion of “objective
history”, explicitly acknowledging their own subjectivity, and encouraging
readers to critically engage with how history is presented.