Abstract
This paper discusses the spectrum of synthesis methods available to generate, explore and
text theory, their value to the field of international development and innovations required
to make better use of the primary research available. It argues for clearer distinctions
between syntheses produced as public goods, and those tailored to specific circumstances;
and strengthening knowledge systems through greater use of maps to navigate existing and
missing evidence, harmonised outcomes and measures, and advances in automation
technologies. Improved methods and guidance are required for synthesising formative
research and investigating contextual factors. Engaging stakeholders and working across
academic disciplines support the production of policy‐relevant syntheses and inspire
methods development.