Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate a 360º project management competency questionnaire relevant to a chemical engineering environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using the input of the employees who took part in the appraisal. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences existed between the multi-rater competency evaluations of different rater groups. Eighty technically qualified employees within a technology development environment were each evaluated by a number of raters, including themselves, their managers, customers and peers. In the case of both the Importance and the Performance Scales, single factors were extracted with internal reliabilities of 0,943 and 0,941 respectively. No significant differences were obtained on paired t-tests between the various rater groups. These findings and their implications are further discussed.