Abstract
The work set out to deconstruct and reconstruct Ted Roberts Gurr's (1970) theory of relative deprivation, frustration-aggression as contained in his work 'Why Men Rebel' (1970). The study used descriptive research design and evaluated the capacity of the theory which was created to explain political violence in Africa and Asia in the colonial era, to also explicate why intense relative deprivation, frustration and aggression arising from the avalanche of poor governance in postcolonial African states such as Nigeria and many others, have not culminated into political violence and rebellion. The study presented numerous data obtained through observation and analysis of events in Nigeria, Africa and case-studies of American, French, English and Russian rebellions and distilled qualitative data which indicated lack of association between the variables. The application of the study design revealed first the