Abstract
M.Tech.
aim of this unblinded randomized control study was to compare Chiropractic Adjustive Therapy (CAT) to Interferential Current Therapy (IFC) as treatment for Painful Minor Intervertebral Dysfunction (PMID) in the lumbar spine. The effects of CAT and IFC on lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) and pain relief from PMID were also examined.
The participants of the trials were treated at the Chiropractic Day Clinic at the University of Johannesburg. Thirty participants presenting with Low Back Pain (LBP) and PMID on segmental intervertebral examination were used for this study and divided into two groups of fifteen. Group A participants were treated with CAT applied to the painful intervertebral segment. Group B participants were treated with IFC over the painful intervertebral segment.
The objective data for this research was recorded by the readings obtained from the application of transverse pressure by a Pressure Algometer to the lateral aspect of a painful spinous process. Further objective readings were taken using a Digital Inclinometer to measure the participants Range of Motion (ROM). Subjective data was obtained by an Oswestry Pain and Disability Index (ODI). The subjective and the objective data were both recorded at the first, fourth and seventh visit which took place over a three week period.
The results of the study showed that Group A had a statistically significant decrease in Pressure Algometer Readings and ODI scores. Group A also showed a statistically significant improvement in ROM readings for Left Lateral Flexion, Left Rotation and Right Rotation. Group B did not show any statistical significance in either the subjective or objective data. Importantly, an Inter-group comparison for the Pressure Algometer Readings also revealed an increasing statistically significant difference between Group A and Group B from the first to the fourth and seventh visit.
The pain elicited by transverse pressure to a spinous process is core to the diagnosis of PMID, which can result in many pain syndromes of vertebral origin (Maigne, 2006). This research provides evidence that CAT is more beneficial than IFC for the treatment of PMID in the lumbar spine over a short and longer period of time.