Abstract
M.Tech.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two different treatment methods for myofascial pain and dysfunction syndrome of the Gluteus Medius muscle. This was done in order to determine whether or not a combined treatment of the integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) adjustive therapy was more effective than the INIT applied in isolation, in the treatment of the Gluteus Medius myofascial pain and dysfunction syndrome (GMMPDS).
Participants were recruited using advertisement posters placed throughout the University of Johannesburg Doornfontein Campus and were treated at the University of Johannesburg Chiropractic Day Clinic.
Thirty participants, between the ages of eighteen and fifty years, who were suffering from lower back pain and presented with Gluteus Medius myofascial trigger points (TrPs) and an SIJ dysfunction were selected for the study. They were randomly assigned into one of two groups, consisting of fifteen subjects each, as they entered into the study. Group one received the INIT to the affected Gluteus Medius muscle. Group two received a combination of the INIT to the affected Gluteus Medius muscle and an SIJ adjustment. Patients attended four sessions over a period of eight days and were treated on all of these sessions.
Subjective and objective data were recorded on all sessions. Subjective data was recorded using the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Objective data was recorded using the Universal Goniometer, to measure hip ranges of motion of the affected Gluteus Medius muscle, and the Wagner Pressure Algometer to measure pain-pressure threshold of the affected Gluteus Medius muscle TrPs. All of the data were statistically analyzed using Repeated Measures and Independent t-Tests. P-values were calculated to determine the statistical significance of the data.
The results of the study indicate that both treatment methods are effective in treating GMMPDS, however a combined treatment approach of INIT and SIJ adjustive therapy was more effective in achieving a greater therapeutic response compared to INIT alone.