Abstract
M.A.
A linear managerialist paradigm is considered normative in the planning,
implementation and evaluation of development through sport initiatives. Such an
approach is also assumed in an audit culture that has a clear bias for quantitative
indicators that measure pre-set outputs and outcomes. The global popularity of
using sport, especially football, as a development tool is being confronted with an
uncompromising evidence burden, expecting rigid justification for money spent
effectively. This approach is epitomised by techniques such as logical frameworks,
which in turn make epistemological and ontological assumptions that are often in
conflict with the local paradigms of recipients. What effect does this normative
approach have on localised initiatives?
A grassroots organisation (GRO) in central Mozambique instinctively employs a
strategy of contestations and compromises to ensure that the people benefit from
the ‘sport and dev’ industry, while maintaining their dignity. The history of
Mozambique coupled with radically distinct contexts lead to donors and recipients
collaborating without the ideals of equality, partnerships, transparency and
participation being realised. Local beneficiaries start to play subversive games
once they sense that they cannot change the donors’ offending impositions. A case
study in central Mozambique, reinforcing the work of critical scholars, points to a
recognition of unequal power relations as the first step out of the current impasse.
An ethnographic approach reveals the complexity of inter-personal relationships,
multiplicity of stakeholders and how a simple concept such as friendship can
redefine power relations. The sustainability of the specific development through a
football programme seems to hinge on the quality of friendship between all the
actors that make up an unarticulated network, governed by unspoken rules.