Abstract
M.A. (Latin)
This study is focused on the different ways the character of the Emperor Nero is
depicted by the biographer Suetonlus and the historiographer Tacitus.
The study is Introduced with an historical survey of the life of Nero. Thereupon a
discussion follows on the life experiences of the authors, Suetonius and Tacitus, as
well as the different style and genre used by each, and suggestions on how their
writings could have been influenced by these factors.
Two aspects of Nero's life are discussed at length, namely his relationship with his
mother (and issues relating to that). as well as his interest in and practising of the
arts (focusing on Nero as a poet, singer and charioteer).
The discussion of these topics is done in the following manner: firstiy Suetonius'
account of the events are given, followed by the account by Tacitus. These versions
are then compared and where different, the candidate suggests possible reasons
for the difference of opinion or presentation between the authors. Various
characteristics of the Emperor Nero are referred to.
The main conclusions can be categorised into three sections:
- First and foremost the authors had different life experiences. Suetonius held
various secretarial positions at the court of Caesar Hadrian which SUbsequently
influenced his writings. He Was not however a senator or interested In politics and
military affairs, which explains the fact that he does not write about political
upheavals and does not contribute political motivations for certain actions of
characters under discussion. Tacitus on the contrary, was a senator during the reign
of Domitian. The atrocities committed by the Emperor and the slowly diminishing
power of the Senate influenced the mind and writings of Tacitus to a great extent.