Abstract
M. Tech.
The Census of 2001 (Statistics South Africa, 2001b) estimates that 80% of the South
African population categorises themselves as Christian. Homoeopathy is part of the
multibillion rand alternative and complementary health industry (Health Products
Association of Southern Africa, 2008). However, there are concerns within the
Christian community about whether or not Homoeopathy is an acceptable healing
modality for Christians. This is in part due to negative perceptions of Homoeopathy
often encouraged by Christian authors such as Brown (n.d.) Dick (n.d.) and Barrett
(2004).
The study sought to investigate the perceptions of South African Christians about
Homoeopathy. Specifically it looked at the Presbyterian and Methodist Christians in
Gauteng, which accounts for 9.8% of Christians in Gauteng (Statistics South Africa,
2001b). The particular areas of investigation were the perceived spirituality
underlying Homoeopathy, Homoeopathy’s origins, the training of Homoeopaths and
lastly the principles of Homoeopathy.
A questionnaire survey was conducted in the Presbyterian and Methodist Churches in
Gauteng. The information sheets and questionnaire were distributed at a variety of
church meetings. The questionnaire was divided into three sections, Section A was
background questions, Section B was questions related to personal perceptions and
attitudes, and lastly, Section C was an optional free open-ended question. It was
proposed that one hundred and eighty questionnaires be completed; one hundred and
seventy seven were used for the analysis. The sample consisted of Ordained
Ministers, Trainee Ministers and Congregants. The questionnaires were analysed by
STATKON using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS).
The statistics were descriptive and comparisons between groups were made using
multi-variant techniques. Section A was analysed by frequencies, Section B was
divided into four factors each dealing with a specific aspect of Homoeopathy,
namely; the perceived spirituality underlying Homoeopathy, the origins of
Homoeopathy, the training of Homoeopaths and lastly the principles of
Homoeopathy. Section C was an open-ended / optional question divided into negative
comments, Neutral / I Do Not Know and positive comments made by the participants.
The Presbyterian sample was compared to the Methodist sample.
There was no personal identifying data on the questionnaires, this allowed for
complete anonymity of all participants. The participants gave consent to participate in
the study by filling in the questionnaire.
The results showed that for Factors one, two and three in the Presbyterian and
Methodist samples, the perception about the spirituality underlying Homoeopathy,
the origins of Homoeopathy and the training of Homoeopaths were all positive.
Factor four, the principles of Homoeopathy, showed a negative perception in all
sample groups except, the Presbyterian Trainee Minister group that showed a
perception of Neutral / I Do Not Know.
There were no statistically significant differences between the Presbyterian and
Methodist Churches. However, there were statistically significant differences within
the sample groups in the Methodist Church, even though their perceptions were all
positive perceptions, the Trainee Minister group showed a greater inclination to a
perception of Neutral / I Do Not Know.
It would be helpful to continue this research into the wider Christian community and
to extend it across all the provinces in South Africa. It was evident from the study
that there is a great need for educating the Christian community about Homoeopathy
and engaging in a comprehensive marketing programme.