Abstract
Construction projects are not immune to challenges, as they can be complicated by constant changes, unpredictable circumstances, and strict timelines. Change orders from the client, inflexibility of the consultant and contractor, lack of coordination with the client, and inadequate response to unanticipated changes all contribute to project failure. Because the traditional approach is a rigid and structured process, some sectors have adopted an agile approach to enhance communication, adaptability, and eliminate any formal modifications to increase project success rates. As a result, a hybrid approach incorporating both structured and flexible project approaches allow for faster response to change while enhancing stakeholder satisfaction.
A search strategy and methodology were used to construct search strings that were used across four databases to find relevant journal articles. The search string identified 1136 articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 890 articles were chosen for a keyword search. Voyant Tools was used to do a keyword search, and only 59 articles were picked after assessing the frequency of each phrase. Finally, using the systematic literature review process, 11 literature pieces were chosen for investigation. To ensure high quality and relevance, the literature articles were examined using a quality evaluation approach. Following the quality assessment, just 8 journal articles remained, yielding a high-quality but small sample space. A web-based application called Connected Publications was used to identify new articles based on the top two performing journal articles from the quality evaluation to extend the sample space. Six more high-quality journal articles were discovered during this examination, bringing the total number of selected journal articles to 14. Thematic analysis was used to examine the raw literature. The 14 articles assisted in understanding the suitability of a hybrid approach to construction projects.
A changing environment was discovered to be suitable for a hybrid approach to project management. Adaptation to changes through client engagement and iterative planning, together with strong stakeholder participation through regular formal and informal meetings to discuss progress and changes to be made will lead to a potentially more effective outcome. A structured environment was shown as unsuitable for a hybrid approach. A structured environment does not allow for planning and budgetary flexibility. A documentation-heavy environment that prevents processes from flowing and impedes project development is not suitable for a hybrid approach.
This research can be used as a reference for project practitioners, as well as to educate organisations on the suitability of a hybrid approach in construction projects to increase the response to changes.