Abstract
M.Sc.
Heavy metals occur naturally in the environment and are found in varying levels in all ground and surface waters. Some heavy metals are essential elements for the normal metabolism of organisms, while others are non-essential and play no significant biological role. Anthropogenic activities do, however, cause an increased discharge of these metals into natural aquatic ecosystems. Aquatic organisms are exposed to unnaturally high levels of these metals. Fish are relatively sensitive to changes in their surrounding environment. Fish health may therefore reflect and give a good indication of the health status of a specific aquatic ecosystem.
Early toxic effects of pollution may only be evident on cellular or tissue level before significant changes can be identified in fish behaviour or external appearance. Histological analysis appears to be a very sensitive parameter and is crucial in determining cellular changes that may occur in target organs, such as the liver. The liver is a detoxification organ and essential for both the metabolism and excretion of toxic substances in the body. Exposure to heavy metals may cause histological changes in the liver. Fish liver histology could therefore serve as a model for studying the interactions between environmental factors and hepatic structures and functions.
In this study, the effect of two heavy metals, cadmium (Cd) and zinc (Zn), on the histology of the liver of the South African freshwater fish species, Oreochromis mossambicus, was investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the toxic effect of cadmium and zinc on the histology of the liver, by identifying significant histological changes in the liver tissue, after exposing the fish to two concentrations of a mixture of cadmium and zinc, over both short and long-term exposure periods. Seventy two, adult O. mossambicus specimens were selected for the study. Two experimental exposures were executed under controlled conditions by means of a flow-through system in an environmental room. For each of the two exposures, twenty-four fish were exposed to different concentrations of cadmium and zinc. The remaining twenty-four specimens were used as a control group. The two respective metal concentrations selected for each exposure were 5% and 10% concentrations of both cadmium and zinc calculated from known LC50 values for cadmium chloride and zinc chloride.
Liver samples were fixated in 10% neutrally buffered formalin and prepared for light microscopy analysis using standard techniques for Haematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) and Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) staining. The liver histology of all seventy two specimens - including the forty eight exposed specimens and twenty four control specimens - were analysed, compared and documented. Although histological analysis can provide a clear indication of the degree of damage caused in the tissue(s) or organ(s) of exposed specimens, the need arises to quantify the histological results in studies where the effects of the exposing substance(s) are compared, to illustrate the possible decrease or increase in histological changes over time or the effect of two different concentrations of the same exposure substance on the histology of the liver.
The histological results in this study were quantified in terms of a histological index. An index value representing the specific histological characteristics of the liver was assigned to each individual specimen indicating either normal histological structure (index value of 0-2) or a possible pathological response (index value of 3-6). Histological changes were identified in specimens exposed for 12, 18, 24, and 96 hours to both the 5% and 10% concentrations of cadmium and zinc, indicating a toxic response after the short-term metal exposures. Similar histological changes were identified in both the 5% and 10% exposed livers. These histological changes included hyalnization, vacuolation, cellular swelling and congestion of blood vessels. The liver histology of fish exposed over a long-term period of 672 hours, did, however, appear relatively normal in both the 5% and 10% exposure groups, indicating an adaptative, regenerative response.
According to the results obtained, it was clear that exposure period did influence the degree of histological changes identified. The two metal concentrations did however seem to have similar histological effects and no definite variation could be identified in terms of 5% and 10% metal concentrations used.
It can therefore be concluded that low concentrations of cadmium and zinc exposure caused histological alterations in the livers of exposed specimens and therefore allows the liver of O. mossambicus to be used as a biomarker of prior exposure to cadmium and zinc.
Dr. G.M. Pieterse