Logo image
Ethical implications of the use of genai in academic writing  : a case study of a first-year communication skills module at a South African university of technology
Thesis   Open access

Ethical implications of the use of genai in academic writing : a case study of a first-year communication skills module at a South African university of technology

Rachael Nyarai Tadokera
Master of Education (M.Ed.), University of Johannesburg
2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10210/520694

Abstract

This study explored the ethical implications of using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in the academic writing of first-year students enrolled in a Communication Skills module at a South African university of technology. A Google Form completed by 219 students was used to identify the GenAI tools commonly used in this context. Students predominantly use ChatGPT 3.5 and Meta AI, largely, due to their accessibility as free platforms. From this group, 18 students were purposively sampled to explore how they used GenAI tools in their academic writing. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), the research examined students’ attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control as determinants of their intentions toward ethical GenAI use. Using a qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, and three focus group discussions – each comprising six participants – were held over a three-week period. Data saturation was reached in the third group focus discussion interviews. Thematic analysis revealed that the majority of students held positive attitudes toward GenAI as a learning aid, while remaining cautious about its potential to diminish creativity and critical thinking. Peer norms generally encouraged the use of GenAI for legitimate learning support, whereas inconsistent institutional guidelines contributed to uncertainty about acceptable practice. Despite unequal digital access and limited policy clarity, students demonstrated strong ethical awareness and openly described how they used GenAI tools in their group assignment. The study concluded that students need to be taught how to choose the right GenAI tools in a given academic writing task, by completing an AI literacy module as part of the Communication Skills course. Fundamental to such training would be that students verify every piece of AIderived information through reputable academic and professional sources. This is important as the rapid integration of GenAI into higher education continues to reshape academic writing practices in the academic community. Universities, in this era of AI in education, must therefore develop contextually relevant AI frameworks for use in academic writing, so that integrity in academia is upheld.
pdf
RN Tadokera - My Final Research Project (Edited) - Final Copy1.58 MBDownloadView
Open Access

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image