Abstract
M.A.
A sample population of nine men arrested in Johannesburg, for killing their female partners (former spouse or girlfriend) is analyzed in the context of their killings. The analysis approaches homicide as a Public Health problem and a preventable phenomenon. The analysis proceeds from Public Health and Bulhanian theoretical perspectives. These theories emphasize the relationship and interplay between the social, political, psychological and economic environments and the overall effect they have on individual processes. By contextualising the homicide event into pre-event, event and post-event categories, the study is able to identify risk factors which played a role in the homicide act. The tool of analysis employed in the service of this study is called the
Haddon Matrix and is widely used in the Public Health domain as a means of identifying and considering, section by section, the risk factors associated with the injury, the relevant research and other knowledge available and what is needed for the future and the priorities for countermeasures. Analysis includes demographic and social characteristics of the perpetrator and the incident.
The results indicate problems in education, communication and the concept of the nuclear family.
In the Public Health-Bulhanian sense, the results indicate that the homicide incident originates and occurs within the context of the prevailing conditions of social structural constraint, in the experienced psychological strain of individuals and in the prevailing threshold of social tolerance.
The lack of basic human needs, such as professional help, for example, is an indication of the impact that the cumulative effect of social structural constraint has on the family's health. The study also found that individuals experience trauma and pain in a context where objective social
conditions affect the rights and privileges of individuals and there is a strain being created on the
subjective world of perception, feeling and meaning. It is this wealth of information on the
trauma points which presents opportunities for prevention. Among the proposed areas for
interventions are: Change individual knowledge, skills or attitudes, such as conflict resolution education, for
example. Change social environments, such as better housing, economic incentives for family
stability and counselling centres. Change physical environments and agents of violence, such as
the availability of dangerous weapons and the increased policing of high risk areas, for example.
In conclusion, the study aspires to enrich existing debate in the area of homicide as a Public
Health issue.