Abstract
M.Sc. (Zoology)
The production of nanoparticles started as early as 1990s (Alkilany & Murphy, 2010). Nanoparticles are utilised in a range of products such as electronics, optics, textiles, medical, devices, cosmetics, food packaging, water treatment technology, fuel cells, catalysts, biosensors and agents for environmental remediation (Handy et al., 2008). Unlike natural particles, which dissolve or aggregate and are often temporary in the environment, engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) maybe persistent due to the stabilization properties of their capping agent (surfactant or organic material). Thus, there is growing concern about the production and fate of ENPs in the environment (Handy et al., 2008).As ENPs pass through the water system they become exposed to different salinities, ionic concentrations and pH changes (Lapresta-Fernández et al., 2012). During this process the ENPs are degraded, transported, altered and accumulated in various ways. Nanoparticles have been found to aggregate in various organelles, for example endocytotic vesicles (Elsaesser & Howard, 2011; Lapresta-Fernández et al., 2012), cytoplasm and the perinuclear region (Mirkin et al., 2010). This can take place via ingestion, endocytosis and or by diffusion (Nowack & Bucheli, 2007). The major question is are NPs toxic and are they more toxic than their metal salts? While bulk gold is distinguished as a chemically inert and a non-toxic substance, (Alkilany & Murphy, 2010) GNPs may be toxic due to their different physicochemical properties such as small particle size, configuration, charge and specific surface area and easy surface alterations (Cho et al., 2009; Goodman et al., 2004; Lapresta-Fernández et al., 2012)...