Abstract
Background
Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection Programmes (NSSPPs) are vital for addressing health disparities in marginalized communities. In the face of global challenges like climate change, wars and epidemics, a solid public policy framework is necessary to tackle public health nutrition issues.
Purpose
This study explored policies guiding the NSSPPs regarding nutrition sensitivity in Gauteng Province, focusing on their shortcomings in meeting nutritional goals. It evaluated the policies against nutrition indicators from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Methods
Utilizing a quantitative approach, a descriptive survey was conducted with a structured questionnaire which was distributed to 80 officials from the Department of Social Development (DSD). The data was analyzed using Pearson Chi-Square to determine relationships between variables.
Results
This study identified six significant Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection Programmes (NSSPPs) in Gauteng Province. It revealed a lack of essential nutrition sensitivity in the existing policy framework, as highlighted by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Key priority areas that need attention include food availability, accessibility, and the provision of diverse nutrient-dense foods, alongside empowering vulnerable groups. Statistical analysis showed a significant Chi-Square p-value of 0.001, indicating a strong link between the supply of nutrient-dense food and cash transfer values for beneficiaries. Additionally, it highlighted a relationship between resource distribution and the empowerment of vulnerable populations, suggesting better resource allocation could enhance support for these groups. Critical gaps identified in the NSSPPs included insufficient male involvement in promoting nutrition for mothers and children, uneven resource distribution affecting women and youth, and delays in cash assistance and nutritional products for those in need.
vi
Conclusion
Out of the broad four priority areas of the NSSPPs, only one is nutritionally sensitive while the other three are partially nutrition-sensitive. This suggests that the NSSPP policy landscape is not fully nutritionally sensitive. Therefore, the current NSSPP policy framework does not effectively align with the expected nutrition sensitivity guidelines prescribed by FAO.