African Banking Corporation of Botswana v Kariba Furniture Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd and others 2015 (5) SA 192 (SCA): a critical analysis of the interpretational glitches of the terms “binding offer” and “reasonable prospect”

Dudzai Chiweshe

Back

African Banking Corporation of Botswana v Kariba Furniture Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd and others 2015 (5) SA 192 (SCA): a critical analysis of the interpretational glitches of the terms “binding offer” and “reasonable prospect”

Thesis

Open access

African Banking Corporation of Botswana v Kariba Furniture Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd and others 2015 (5) SA 192 (SCA): a critical analysis of the interpretational glitches of the terms “binding offer” and “reasonable prospect”

Dudzai Chiweshe

LLM, University of Johannesburg

2017

Handle:

https://hdl.handle.net/10210/236552

Abstract

Banking law

Banks and banking

Furniture industry and trade

ABC Holdings Limited

LL.M. (Commercial Law) Please refer to full text to view abstract

Files and links (1)

pdf

African Banking Corporation of Botswana v Kariba Furniture Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd and others 2015 (5) SA 192 (SCA): A critical analysis of the interpretational glitches of the terms “binding offer” and “reasonable prospect”Download View

Open Access

Metrics

12 File views/ downloads

62 Record Views

Details

Title: African Banking Corporation of Botswana v Kariba Furniture Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd and others 2015 (5) SA 192 (SCA): a critical analysis of the interpretational glitches of the terms “binding offer” and “reasonable prospect”
Creators - without role: Dudzai Chiweshe
Contributors - without role: J. Calitz
Awarding Institution: University of Johannesburg; LLM
Theses and Dissertations: LLM, University of Johannesburg
Identifiers: 9912916807691
Copyright: University of Johannesburg
Academic Unit: Department of Mercantile Law
Resource Type: Thesis