Abstract
M.A. (Marketing Communication)
In this study it is argued that the consumer has evolved and grown into a force that is no longer passive, taking the actions of its brands for granted. They ask questions, challenge and are inherently active, a state of being that is accelerated, facilitated and aided by the Internet and social media. This active stakeholder concept is operationally defined as the pressure exerted by informed consumers to hold brands and organisations responsible and accountable for the well-being of society and the environment, beyond the maximisation of profit, and to expect such entities to be responsive to and in dialogue with consumers as stakeholders of brands and organisations.
It is questioned, at the same time, to what extent South African brand leaders have stayed current and informed with regard to this new breed of active consumer stakeholder, and whether Corporate Social Responsibility practices are not often used as a smokescreen to ‘greenwash’ actions.
The study aimed to address the research problem by linking the key concepts of corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory, normative stakeholder theory, corporate social responsiveness, stakeholder activism, stakeholder communication and accountability in an attempt to ascertain to what extent the active consumer stakeholder concept has taken root in strategic communication activities of 50 brand leaders in the country, and to develop a measuring instrument for brands to evaluate to what extent they are attuned to the active consumer stakeholder concept.
The research methodology made use of reliability tests and cluster analyses, themes were established based on an extensive literature review. Ultimately, the tool was comprised of a series of Likert-type questions, a ranking question and three open-ended questions which added depth to the other elements of the tool.
The findings indicate a lack of congruence, within the sphere of South African brand leaders, with regards to the notion of the active consumer stakeholder. However, they also suggest an assimilation, and move to congruence, through a connection between the nuances that exist at both ends of the stakeholder continuum i.e. shareholder theory and stakeholder theory. Doing good will ultimately be equated with making money.