Abstract
Heat shock proteins (HSP), although not considered classical defence proteins, have general cytoprotective properties, which promote survival of cells and organisms. Hsp70, in particular, provides resistance to the harmful consequences of various forms of otherwise damaging or even lethal stress including pathogen infection. Increased levels of Hsp70, due to stable transfection of cells with hsp70 genes, or elevated expression in response to stress, generally correlate with the hindrance of cell death processes triggered by a variety of noxious stimuli or toxic agents. The effect of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), the major constituent of the outer membrane of the cell wall (envelope) of almost all Gram-negative bacteria, on Hsp70/Hsc70 expression in plants is unknown. In various mammalian systems, LPS has been shown to induce Hsp70 accumulation, along with programmed (apoptotic) cell death. Contrary to the effects of LPS on animal hosts however, LPS does not elicit cell death in plants, but rather pre-treatment with LPS fraction can prevent or delay the so-called hypersensitive response (HR), thus sensitizing plant tissue to respond more rapidly, or to a greater extent, to subsequently inoculated phytopathogenic bacteria. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) reportedly contribute to stress sensing and hsp gene activation, and subsequent Hsp70 induction, during the stress response. Increased ROS production can also trigger cell death via either programmed cell death (PCD), an active (i.e., energy-dependent) physiological suicide mechanism that is genetically regulated, or uncontrolled necrosis, an accidental, lytic form of cell destruction passively triggered by severe trauma or injury. In plants specifically, ROS may be involved in PCD activation during the HR. As a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) or general elicitor of defence or resistance-related responses, LPS may trigger some defence-related responses, including an oxidative burst (manifest as increased levels of reactive oxygen species or ROS) in certain plant cells as it does in animal systems. However, there is conflicting evidence that shows that LPS treatment does not elicit an oxidative burst in plants. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of LPS isolated from Ralstonia solanacearum, an extremely harmful soil-borne bacterium that causes Southern wilt in over 200 plant species by infecting the host’s roots and invading the xylem vessels, on Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation, cell death and ROS production in suspension-cultured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells, in order to gain a better understanding of the inter-relationship between these three phenomena in plant cells responding to LPS(Ralstonia).
Western (immuno)blot analysis was used to study the unknown effect of LPS(Ralstonia) on Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation in tobacco cell suspensions. LPS(Ralstonia) (all concentrations and time periods studied) generally suppressed Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation. However, only exposure to 100 μg LPS/ml for 3 h caused a significant reduction (P < 0.05). Therefore, there was an early suppression of Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation in response to 100 μg LPS(Ralstonia)/ml.
To determine whether the observed LPS-mediated attenuation in Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation was due to an increase in cell death in these cells, we investigated the effect of LPS(Ralstonia) on i) the general viability of the cells, and ii) the integrity of nuclear or genomic DNA extracted from LPS-treated suspension-cultured tobacco cells.
The AlamarBlue™ (AB) assay was used to investigate the general cell viability in response to LPS(Ralstonia) treatment. LPS(Ralstonia) (all concentrations and time intervals studied) did not significantly affect the overall viability of the cells. Because treatment of tobacco cell suspensions with LPS(Ralstonia) did not result in a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in AB reduction, it was presumed that LPS(Ralstonia) did not appreciably compromise metabolic activity and was therefore not particularly toxic to these cells.
Genomic DNA from cells undergoing PCD-associated internucleosomal DNA fragmentation (IDF) typically runs as a ladder of internucleosomal-sized DNA fragments corresponding to multimers of ca. 180 bp in agarose gels. In contrast, random DNA cleavage, usually manifest as smearing of nuclear DNA following agarose gel electrophoresis, is a token of uncontrolled necrosis. Therefore, if so-called “DNA laddering” is observed following agarose gel electrophoresis of genomic DNA extracted from suspension-cultured tobacco cells exposed to LPS(Ralstonia) then it can be assumed that LPS(Ralstonia) induced PCD. Alternatively, if a long, continuous “necrotic smear” is evident after electrophoretic separation of nuclear DNA from LPS-treated cells then LPS(Ralstonia) clearly induced uncontrolled necrosis. Whether or not LPS(Ralstonia) induced PCD-associated IDF or necrotic smearing was determined by investigating genomic DNA fragmentation (or DNA integrity) in response to LPS(Ralstonia) iii
treatment. Although no typical DNA ladders were detected following electrophoresis of DNA isolated from LPS-treated cells, PCD may still have transpired. However, this is highly unlikely. No necrotic smearing was evident in LPS-treated samples either, which verifies the hypothesis that LPS(Ralstonia) (25–100 μg/ml) did not induce uncontrolled necrosis in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. In fact, these concentrations of LPS(Ralstonia) did not seem to significantly compromise DNA integrity given that LPS(Ralstonia) (25–100 μg/ml) generally had no appreciable effect on genomic DNA fragmentation (compared to untreated control samples). Incidentally, 24-h exposure of tobacco cell suspensions to higher concentrations of LPS(Ralstonia) (500 and 1000 μg/ml) may have resulted in partial DNA cleavage and/or degradation. Exposure of tobacco cell suspensions to 400 μg LPS(Burkholderia)/ml for 7 days may also have evoked partial DNA cleavage and/or degradation. Whether this cleavage and/or degradation occurred deliberately by means of a fixed or predetermined mechanism or randomly by an uncontrolled mechanism remains uncertain.
Finally, the H2DCF-DA (2′, 7′-dihydrodichlorofluorescein-diacetate) fluorescence assay was used to investigate the effect of LPS(Ralstonia) on ROS production, a common factor in the regulation of HSP expression and cell death activation. LPS(Ralstonia) treatment (25–100 μg/ml) generally increased ROS levels in suspension-cultured tobacco cells (compared to untreated control cells). Exposure to 75 μg LPS(Ralstonia)/ml resulted in a particularly prominent elevation in ROS levels almost instantaneously. Incidentally, higher concentrations of LPS(Ralstonia) (500 and 1000 μg/ml) resulted in decreased ROS levels at some point during the assay.
Although LPS(Ralstonia) (100 μg/ml for 3 h) significantly decreased Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation in tobacco cell suspensions, cell death did not appear to be induced. In fact, LPS(Ralstonia) had no effect on general cell viability and appeared to be ineffective at causing PCD-associated IDF (DNA laddering) or necrotic smearing regardless of concentration or time of exposure. Despite these findings, treatment of suspension-cultured tobacco cells with LPS(Ralstonia) (≤ 100 μg/ml) resulted in a mild increase in ROS production. Although the exact mechanism(s) by which LPS(Ralstonia) suppressed Hsp70/Hsc70 accumulation is elusive, our results suggest that the suppression is not related to excessive LPS-mediated injury caused by excessively high ROS levels or increased cell death. We speculate that the prevention of HR-related PCD often observed in plants that are pre-treated with LPS and subsequently inoculated with phytopathogenic bacteria may be dependent on the LPS-mediated suppression of cytosolic Hsp70 expression.
Dr. M.J. Cronje