Abstract
Globally, the success of elite athletes at international competitions attracts the attention of
governments due to the potential sociocultural, political and economic benefits. Underpinned
by a systems theory framework, governments invest a substantial amount of resources into
the professionalisation of elite sport systems. The mere existence of elite sport systems can
no longer predict success. Rather, Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) plans can only
have effect through optimal management that facilitates the development of athletes in their
sporting careers. Although judo is relatively less lucrative for professional judokas, it is one
of the most widespread Olympic sports, and requires sound governance to ensure credibility,
secure resources and achieve success. This thesis firstly reflects on the professionalisation of
sport at the global level from a figurational sociological perspective and in the three sample
countries. Secondly, elite sport systems are discussed and applied to judo in the countries
under study. Thirdly, results provide strategic insights for improving existing high
performance judo practices through the management of judokas and the governance of the
sport federations. Two internationally successful judo countries (The Netherlands and
England) were selected for this comparative case study analysis with South Africa. A
purposive sample of elite judokas from South Africa (n=37), the Netherlands (n=38) and
England (n=29), as well as elite judo coaches (n=26) and executive members (n=2) from the
respective countries participated in this study. The research found that more successful elite
judo systems have comprehensive policies that create an enabling environment through
facilitating access to resources and forming key strategic alliances. Coach education,
performance pathways and access to high performance training facilities are essential
mechanisms that contribute to successful elite sport performances. A contextualised
approach to discuss governance principles and the articulation of different systems that
incorporate macro-level considerations, is suggested. These outcomes are affected by
circumstances and power relations inherent in society and within the sport fraternity.
D.Phil. (Sport Management)